http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59332
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> --- It was discovered by accident. However, if it does work, why "no-lto" (which is so much more useful) should not work?
d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:10:23 -0800
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59332
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> --- It was discovered by accident. However, if it does work, why "no-lto" (which is so much more useful) should not work?