http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[second test case]
(In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #0)
> A similar code snippet triggers an ICE in a different position on trunk:

Reduced example:

void foo()
{
  _Complex int j;
#pragma omp parallel reduction (&:j)
  ;
}


I wonder whether it is valid as the following is rejected with "error: invalid
operands to binary & (have 'complex int' and 'complex int')":

_Complex int foo(_Complex int j)
{
  _Complex int k = -1;
  j &=  k;
}

Reply via email to