http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2013-12-13
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think you likely see a 2nd-order effect. Inlining a once called function
should not increase code size. But of course optimization opportunities
exposed by it may trigger optimizers that are not well tuned to honor -Os.
So, can you narrow down the issue a bit?
