http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> --- > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469 > > --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf <octoploid at yandex dot com> --- > In the non-lto case one has: > lib/libLLVMAsmParser.so: > U > _ZN4llvm21SymbolTableListTraitsINS_10BasicBlockENS_8FunctionEE21transferNodesFromListERNS_12ilist_traitsIS1_EENS_14ilist_iteratorIS1_EES8_ I think this is a bug by itself, since the symbol seems to be nonkeyed comdat and thus every unit that use it should define it. > If I understand you correctly, you say that the undefined symbol > of lib/libLLVMAsmParser.so is a bug in LLVM. I think it is eitehr bug in source (LLVM). Most probably becuase libLLVMAsmParser simply omits inline definition in libLLVMAsmParser.so where it should not or some sort of bug in C++ visibility logic. For that we need to figure out how the symbol is defined and used in lib/libLLVMAsmParser.so Honza