http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59413
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ah, my fault then, terribly sorry, I've simplified the testcase a little bit (removed the typedef and used unsigned int instead). Apparently for the reproduction it is important that the c variable uses some typedef to unsigned int rather than that type directly.
