http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-01-12 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- Other problems extracted form pr48906 [Book15] f90/bug% cat pr48906_4.f90 print "(ru,g15.2)", .099d0 ! > 0.10E+00 expected 0.10 print "(rc,g15.1)", .095d0 ! > 0.1E+00 expected 0.1 print "(rc,g15.2)", .0995d0 ! > 0.10E+00 expected 0.10 print "(ru,g15.3)", .0999d0 ! > 0.100E+00 expected 0.100 end [Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_4.f90 [Book15] f90/bug% a.out 0.10 0.1 0.10 0.100 [Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_4.f90 -m32 [Book15] f90/bug% a.out 0.10E+00 0.1E+00 0.10E+00 0.100E+00 [Book15] f90/bug% cat > pr48906_1_red.f90 print "(rc,g10.2,'<')", 99.5 ! 10. expected 0.10E+03 end [Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_1_red.f90 [Book15] f90/bug% a.out 0.10E+03< [Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_1_red.f90 -m32 [Book15] f90/bug% a.out 100. < Note that the numerical values are correct for these tests.