http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-01-12
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Other problems extracted form pr48906

[Book15] f90/bug% cat pr48906_4.f90
 print "(ru,g15.2)", .099d0 ! > 0.10E+00 expected 0.10
 print "(rc,g15.1)", .095d0 ! > 0.1E+00 expected 0.1
 print "(rc,g15.2)", .0995d0 ! > 0.10E+00 expected 0.10
 print "(ru,g15.3)", .0999d0 ! > 0.100E+00 expected 0.100
end
[Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_4.f90
[Book15] f90/bug% a.out
       0.10    
        0.1    
       0.10    
      0.100    
[Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_4.f90 -m32
[Book15] f90/bug% a.out
       0.10E+00
        0.1E+00
       0.10E+00
      0.100E+00

[Book15] f90/bug% cat > pr48906_1_red.f90
    print "(rc,g10.2,'<')", 99.5 ! 10. expected 0.10E+03
end
[Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_1_red.f90
[Book15] f90/bug% a.out
  0.10E+03<
[Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr48906_1_red.f90 -m32
[Book15] f90/bug% a.out
  100.    <

Note that the numerical values are correct for these tests.

Reply via email to