http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59893
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > LTO is not really a brand new, experimental and exotic option anymore. I > believe that by default, on systems that support it, we should build the > static > target libraries that are part of gcc with -flto (and obviously > -ffat-lto-objects). This should have no impact on people not using LTO (well, Are LTO objects now independent of the compiler host (see bug 41526) (so that such libraries will work properly when copied from one host to another as part of a Canadian cross build)?
