http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066
--- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Dear All, I propose to add the attached to the testsuite. It is the testcase from PR60066, which was fixed by the patch for PR59066. OK for trunk, 4.8 and 4.7? On 5 February 2014 12:38, pault at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066 > > Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED > > --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) >> > I have applied the patch at >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-02/txtX3eVILZEGw.txt >> > on top of 4.8.3 r206497 and the test runs successfully ... >> >> Marking as duplicate of pr49906. >> >> Paul, >> >> For the record, no regression when testing with >> >> make -k -j8 check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" >> >> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49906 *** > > I will, however, add this testcase to that of PR59906 - it is different yet > again from the verification tests although it is fixed by the patch. > > Cheers > > Pau > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.