http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > TODO: A proper treatment of array arguments seems to be missing for both > SIZEOF > and STORAGE_SIZE. ??? besides if (sizeof(b) /= 24) call abort() if (storage_size(b) /= 64) call abort() > Question is whether the patch should be applied now and the array treatment > added later, or if it should happen in one go. Unless the patch remove the ICE by silent wrong codes, I'ld say incremental fix is not bad.
