http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work| |4.6.0 Keywords| |wrong-code Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-09 CC| |jb at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|Wrong length when |[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] |allocating character array |Wrong length when | |allocating character array Known to fail| |4.7.4, 4.8.3, 4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- Confirmed, up to revision r173749 I get 10 1 from r173750 to r174379 I get 10 2 and from r174433 up to r209236 I get 10 0 What is surprising is that r173750, r174030, and r174415 are related to backtrace handling, so they probably only expose a latent problem(?).