http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009
--- Comment #13 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> --- Jeff, Thanks for the fix! Confirming that it does indeed fix the application issues we hit. Teresa On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 PM, law at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009 > > --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Author: law > Date: Fri May 9 04:54:00 2014 > New Revision: 210254 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210254&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2014-05-08 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> > > PR tree-optimization/61009 > * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_through_normal_block): Return a > tri-state rather than a boolean. When a block is too big to > thread through, inform caller via negative return value. > (thread_across_edge): If a block was too big for normal threading, > then it's too big for a joiner too, so remove temporary equivalences > and return immediately. > > PR tree-optimization/61009 > * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61009.C: New test. > > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61009.C > Modified: > trunk/gcc/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
