https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #7)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6)
>
> > I'd prefer the RHS location here; it's the RHS that's being converted.
>
> I was hoping to automate some conversion from C to C++ using
> the error locations.
> So from this perspective, something relatively consistent would be nice.
> It could be the RHS or it could be the "=", for my purposes they
> are equally good. I tend to think of the "=" as being the "reason
> for the conversion", but I wouldn't want to make any claims for it
> beyond that.
If you point to '=', then the macro expansion note will not appear in your
other example (PR61165).
