https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62005
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > That said, an interesting question is why we don't warn about this without > rtl checking, the function still returns address of the parameter. Is that > because it is inlined in that case and so we don't warn then? That seems likely, RTL checking may make the function large enough not to be inlined. Compiling without RTL checking but with -fkeep-inline-functions probably warns as well then.
