https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) >> The new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c test FAILs on 64-bit SPARC (only; >> 32-bit is >> ok): >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI" 1 >> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "p_[0-9]* <" >> 1 >> >> I'm attaching the ivopts dump. [...] > According to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00345.html, could > you have a look whether the huge cost returned on sparc64 is as expected? I think that's easiest for Eric to say. Rainer