https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to steveren from comment #11) > So assuming it's not actually beyond somebody completely unfamiliar with the > innards of gcc, what would be the response to a patch which changed #pragma > message from 'statement' to 'not-a-statement'? I think that even if not a definitive solution, it would be a positive step towards understanding what would it take to change the behavior for specific #pragmas (since we cannot change how OMP #pragmas behave).