https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #24 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #23) > (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #21) > > > Then we have three problematic patterns and the easiest way to handle it is > > to get rid of ix86_bnd_prefixed_insn_p call in length computation for them. > > I think the easiest way to do it is to have separate bnd and nobnd patterns > > for these instructions. Attached patch helps me to resolve valgrind error. > > Is such approach fine? > > Maybe "enabled" attribute can help here to avoid unnecessary duplication. No, please disregard the above sentence. The aproach with two patterns looks OK AFAICS.
