https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> --- A few other refinements to -Wc++-compat that I would like to see: 1. Have it properly handle stuff like the following idiom commonly found in header files: #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif /* code that is C-only */ #ifdef __cplusplus } #endif /* __cplusplus */ I would expect -Wc++-compat to treat something like the above similarly to how the following pragmas would work: #pragma GCC diagnostic push #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++-compat" /* code that -Wc++-compat should ignore */ #pragma GCC diagnostic pop While the version with pragmas is shorter, the `extern "C"` stuff is often needed for separate reasons, and as such, it would be nice to avoid the need to do both... 2. Make -Wc++-compat an "umbrella" warning flag like -Wall or -Wextra. Currently -Wc++-compat warns about many different things, and sometimes I would like to just focus on one of those things. I can think of at least the following sub-flags that could be split off from it: ** "-Wc++-compat-pointer-conversion" for the ones like "warning: request for implicit conversion from 'void *' to 'char *' not permitted in C++" ** "-Wc++-compat-keywords" for the ones like "warning: identifier 'class' conflicts with C++ keyword" ** "-Wc++-compat-visibility" for the ones like "warning: enum constant defined in struct or union is not visible in C++" (or likewise with "struct" or "union" instead of "enum constant")