https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64416
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |EH Target| |arm Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I suspect it's unlikely the EABI will be expanded in this direction; at least until (unless) these types get implemented in hardware. Furthermore, there's a high chance that if HW did implement 128-bit types, it would be done in a way that was incompatible with any design choices we made now, rendering a necessary ABI break or significant performance penalty. My inclination is to close this as 'WONTFIX', with the understanding that if a new ABI with such an extension does appear, support for it would be an automatic step to implementing that ABI revision.