https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Indeed, that's the easy workaround. I'd have thought the obvious definition > for the single multi-associate statement would be to be a shortcut exactly > equivalent to nested associates. In my mind it was not a workaround. From what I understand (little) of the Kargl's comment 1, the two forms should be either rejected or accepted.
