https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #24 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-02-06 6:33 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631 > > --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >> OK, this is fixed on the SPARC, but not on the PA where we still have 2 IVs. > Correction: we have only one IV on the PA, but it's 'i' and not 'p'. > > Dave, is the generated code optimimal on the PA or should the compiler use > 'p'? > I'll take a look on the weekend. Dave
