https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, -r should be honored by the appropriate resolution info (not _IR_ONLY).
Thus you have to treat that conservatively.
Otherwise you can create a testcase that fails with the final link and the
other strong definition in a shared library.
