https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 > > --- Comment #42 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Sorry, accidental message. > > It is 69->80.5s between 141127.61083 and 150113.26056 (tester was down) > 66->69s between 141123.15275 and 141124.01653 > 60->64 between 140807.80282 and 140808.66762 > > Now the other tester shows > 59->50 between 150112.41636 and 150113.13858 > 51->53 between 141124.14999 and 141123.43031 > 45->48 between 140807.01584 and 140808.72560 > > Can we, please, restart the frescobaldi tester? It is down sine 23rd. Not sure what happened - trying to investigate. Btw, terbium usually shows more smooth graphs (ok, it's Itanic...) (http://gcc.opensuse.org/c++bench-terbium/tramp3d/split-build.html) I'll see whether I can find the time to setup C++ testing on czerny. For terbium it's 114 -> 124 between 141030.96758 (r216126) and 141211.32597 (r218621) (tester was down) 123 -> 128 between 141228.22340 (r219074) and 141228.90737 (r219088) 129 -> 160 between 150112.86585 (r219449) and 150113.55305 (r219508) 162 -> 139 between 150119.02405 (r219836) and 150120.70780 (r219878) 138 -> 127 between 150330.74477 (r221762) and 150330.46734 (r221770)
