https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #15 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- Created attachment 35230 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35230&action=edit altered patch for the regressions reported in comment 11 Hi, As it seems the problem with the program bug.f90 is that the generic attribute is set in a symbol as the parser tries to match a declaration type specification; but finally, the statement isn't matched as such and the generic attribute wasn't cleared. So, the attached patch makes the cleanup, without causing the regressions listed in comment 9. The question here is if gfortran had to print an error message for this program: module types public :: undefined end module types write (*,*) "undefined types!" end --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PS: I've not checked out the source code from a repo, so the attached patch is just the output of the diff command (not svn diff).
