https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66007
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle
dot com
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Right Jakub. To my taste, fiddling directly with those counters isn't that
nice, but I know we do it in a few other places. In any case this code is
rather hackish anyway, we try to do something we don't do anywhere else,
effectively suppressing an hard error via -Wno-*. Also, as I already said, I
was thinking that normally elsewhere in the code, we do not handle pedwarns as
errors, we don't consider that -pedantic-errors may be in effect (in the
pedwarn right before too). What can I say, maybe we can ask Jason, which
solution he prefers in principle? In the meanwhile I do some testing.
