https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66130
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #7)
> First blush I'm wondering if in this specific case we couldn't forward from
> dump_decl to dump_expr and just print ‘l->*ptr’. AFAICS, wouldn't be a
> regression and would allow us to adopt immediately Manuel' patch.
I could simply do
if (DECL_P(expr)) error("%qD") else error("%qE")
but I was trying to avoid %qE because I think pretty-printing user coded
expressions is something we should always avoid since they usually do not come
out as written by the user.
I would prefer to print:
error: invalid use of non-static member function 'void (Local::*ptr)()'
which tells the user that ->*ptr is a pointer to member-function.
