https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66528
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work| |5.1.0
Keywords| |error-recovery
Last reconfirmed| |2015-06-13
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|unbalanced IF/ENDIF with |[6 Regression] unbalanced
|-fmax-errors=1 causes |IF/ENDIF with
|invalid free |-fmax-errors=1 causes
| |invalid free
Known to fail| |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Much better with a test case, of course.
Indeed!-) Revision r223447 (2015-05-20) gives
Error: END IF statement expected at (1)
compilation terminated due to -fmax-errors=1.
Revision r223694 (2015-05-26) gives
compilation terminated due to -fmax-errors=1.
f951(2326,0x7fff7bef0300) malloc: *** error for object 0x1412fd9a8: pointer
being freed was not allocated
*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
(null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
f951(2326,0x7fff7bef0300) malloc: *** error for object 0x142002200: pointer
being freed was not allocated
*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
Usual suspect r223677 (pr66082).
