https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66584
--- Comment #4 from Jason McG <jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com> --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2) > What would you like us to document exactly? How are we supposed to track ... Perhaps I was unclear. I am asking that you point out to me in the gcc documentation where it comments regarding code generation for switch-statements, and that it might make clear that the lexographic "top-down" approach nor the default label are preferred but other, more complex heuristics are used that defeat static branch-prediction analysis. I do not think this is unreasonable. So I disagree entirely that this is invalid.
