https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Bug ID: 67429
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
CC: bur...@net-b.de, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When compiling the test in pr65045 with r218570 I get the errors
pr65045.f90:3.6:
if (i>7.7) then
1
Error: Symbol at (1) is not appropriate for an expression
pr65045.f90:5.7:
else
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE statement at (1)
pr65045.f90:6.6:
i = 2.2
1
Error: 'i' at (1) is not a variable
pr65045.f90:7.6:
end if
1
Error: Expecting END BLOCK statement at (1)
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
f951: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6
gfortran: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6 (program f951)
Abort
With revision r218658, the errors are
pr65045.f90:3:6: Error: Symbol at (1) is not appropriate for an expression
pr65045.f90:5:7:
else
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE statement at (1)
pr65045.f90:6:6: Error: 'i' at (1) is not a variable
pr65045.f90:7:6:
end if
1
Error: Expecting END BLOCK statement at (1)
(null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Likely r218619 or r218627.
This may explain pr67174.
