https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #99 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #98) > I guess that these pr64661-x.c regressions are not so problem, though. I agree. > I'm not sure whether hiconst.c regression is serious or not. I think we can ignore this for now. It's about loading/sharing constants. There are more constant related inefficiencies which can be addressed later. > The serious one would be > > Running target sh-sim/-m2/-mb > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c -Os execution test I will have a look at it. > My sh4-unknown-linux-gnu test also shows another execution > errors for libstdc++-v3. > > New tests that FAIL: > > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/14.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/19.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/22131.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/38399.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/39168.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/6.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/8.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_get/get/wchar_t/9.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_put/put/wchar_t/39168.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_put/put/wchar_t/5.cc execution test > 22_locale/money_put/put/wchar_t/6.cc execution test > > These tests compiled with -mlra don't fail with libstdc++-v3 > library compiled with -mno-lra, i.e. libstdc++-v3 is miscompiled > with -mlra. These wrong code problems should be resolved before > witch to LRA. Hm .. those don't fail on sh-elf ... maybe something related to the atomics? Atomics are off by default for sh-elf, but on for sh-linux.
