https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > Tobias' version is prettier! Does it apply without regressions? > > Obviously the patch in comment 0 no longer applies. > > Now finding 'gfc_expr_attr (expr2).pointer' prettier than > 'expr2->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer' is just a matter of taste (29 > characters compared to 35). For a newbie like the later is easier to > understand than the former. It isn't just a matter of taste. when expr2 is a subreference (say obj%proc_ptr(...)), it's the pointerness of the result of the proc_ptr interface that matters, not that of obj. > > BTW what should it be for 'value.function.esym'? Hmm, gfc_expr_attr should handle it gracefully.
