https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Dear Dominique, I think that a meta-bug would be an excellent idea. I am 5 regressions away from a fix for this PR. I'll get the patch to you over the weekend. Many thanks for your support Paul On 5 November 2015 at 10:33, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > If this help, I have found the following PRs related to deferred-length: > pr49630, pr49954, pr50221, pr54070, pr55735, pr57735, pr57910, pr63932, > pr65677, pr66408, and pr67674. Will it worth opening a "meta-bug" for them? or > adding '[DL]' at the beginning of the summaries? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
