https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68259
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[6 Regression][sso][UBSAN] |[6 Regression][sso] tree |ICE tree check: expected |checking failure in |record_type or union_type |reverse_storage_order_for_c |or qual_union_type or |omponent_p, at tree.h:4392 |array_type, have | |reference_type in | |reverse_storage_order_for_c | |omponent_p, at tree.h:4392 | --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I can reproduce, but the ASAN tree doesn't look valid to me, it's a COMPONENT_REF of a REFERENCE_TYPE. I guess I can kludge around it though (there is already such a kludge for invalid Fortran trees).