https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko <chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se from comment #6) > Is this fix in gcc 4.9.3? No, this didn't go to GCC 4.9, only to GCC 5. > If not, will go into 4.9.4? Well, actually we didn't plan backport this on gcc-4.9 branch, the case is quite specific. But I think it would be pretty easy to backport the fix now. I can do it if there aren't objections from GCC hackers.
