https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > In our code, we have about a 400 allocates that are checked for istat, > and do nothing else than abort after signalling the size of the allocation. > It is error prone (e.g. wrong sizes, missing check after istat, etc. etc.), > and would like to get rid of this, as the compiler can do this much better. I am still not convinced. IMO enhancements have only two realistic status: WONTFIX or ASSIGNED.