https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9) > I'll take a look at Steve's proposed patch tonight. In the meantime, I have > taken the PR. > > Cheers > > Paul Steve's patch is good... obvious, even :-) Here is a dejagnuified version of the testcase: ! { dg-do compile } ! ! Test the fix for PR68237 in which 'foo' caused a seg fault rather than an error. ! ! Contributed by Martin Reinecke <mar...@mpa-garching.mpg.de> ! module m1 interface module subroutine bar end subroutine end interface end module m1 submodule (m1) m2 contains module procedure foo ! { dg-error "must be in a generic module interface" } end procedure ! { dg-error "Expecting END SUBMODULE statement" } end submodule I'll try to find the time to commit this afternoon; otherwise it will be next week. Paul