https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- After discussion on IRC, it seems better to keep your patch as-is, since cilk-plus is not supported on arm anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- After discussion on IRC, it seems better to keep your patch as-is, since cilk-plus is not supported on arm anyway.