https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68934
--- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Real code does not scope simd type definitions tightly enough to make this > feasible even if it were desirable. there was an instance of this in Bug #68895. The second function ices while using int8x8_t types while in vfp mode. So we should probably decide if the code is legitimate or not (and close as invalid). And if it is how the RTL can this bi-morphism. The only solution I had in mind was to play with registered_builtin_types in the lang hooks, but I agree it is not practical.
