https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2016-01-08
CC| |alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, not a dup - 69053 results from a type mismatch/missing conversion building
the initial value for a COND_EXPR; this PR is because the 'reduction' is an
RDIV_EXPR, which get_initial_def_for_reduction doesn't handle.
The testcase invokes undefined behaviour, too (e is not initialized). Moving
'double *e' to be a parameter to fn2 avoids the ICE.
