https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-01-08 CC| |adam at jessamine dot co.uk, | |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Depends on| |65750 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Looks like the fix for 65750 needs to be adjusted to handle this case as well. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65750 [Bug 65750] [4.9/5 Regression] misinterpret in a virtual member function with a C++11 style function signature