https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69276
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 37341 [details]
> suggested patch
>
> + else if (is_gimple_call (stmt) && gimple_store_p (stmt)
> + && gimple_clobber_p (stmt))
> + {
> + asan_mem_ref r;
> + asan_mem_ref_init (&r, NULL, 1);
> +
> + r.start = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
> + r.access_size = int_size_in_bytes (TREE_TYPE (r.start));
> + return has_mem_ref_been_instrumented (&r);
> + }
> +
>
> This condition is never true, did you mean !gimple_clobber_p instead?
> But obviously calls are never clobbers, so there is no need to test that.
Sure, that was a typo, yeah it can be removed from the condition ;)
