https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530

--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Is the r229087 change still needed after r229458?

Backout r229087 doesn't cause gcc.target/i386/pr67609-2.c nor 
gcc.target/i386/pr67609.c to fail.

Reply via email to