https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Is the r229087 change still needed after r229458? Backout r229087 doesn't cause gcc.target/i386/pr67609-2.c nor gcc.target/i386/pr67609.c to fail.