https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Merillat from comment #8) > One thing remains. As a result of 52023, C11 _Alignof was "fixed" to return > the smallest possible alignment, but C++11 was left alone "deliberately", > although "C++11 will need examining to determine what is right for alignof > there". I didn't see any such discussion for C++11 or C++14 alignof(), and > by my reading of the specifications, they are defined almost identically to > C11 _Alignof. See Joseph's explanation at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg00435.html
