https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #26 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #25) [...] > I have a patch that seems to work for this test case; am testing it more > thoroughly now. Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01424.html (see also: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01425.html )
