https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Comment #78 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 > > --- Comment #77 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #72) > > > > Patch as posted passed bootstrap & regtest. Adjusted according to > > comments but not tested otherwise - please somebody throw at > > unpatched 416.gamess. > > Still miscompares on aarch64, I'm afraid. (Both with and without > -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations.) > > Also where Jakub wrote: > > If you want to go this way, I'd at least key it off DECL_COMMON on the decl. > > And instead of multiplying max_size by 2 perhaps just add BITS_PER_UNIT? > > I wonder why you prefer setting such an arbitrary guess at max_size rather > than > going with -1 which is defined as "unknown" ? That would pessimize it too much IMHO.
