https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
So does anyone agree with Segher's assessment here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg133974.html
Essentially that this is a minor regression and that the rs6000 backend changes
necessary to fix the regression are too risky for stage4?
In which case we should consider downgrading to P2.
Thoughts?
