https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) ... snip ... > > My gut feeling is that it has something to do with having "precision" == 17 > in that function. In any case, the nafter is too large when nblanks is > calculated. Yes, and I find one place where after a memmove to align digits, the significant digit gets wiped to a zero, really odd. I am on the hunt
