https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Is there something new in the C++ standards, or is this a g++ regression?
Since dy is a dependent template name you have to write
return y.template dy<X>();
So I think this is a case of earlier versions of gcc wrongly accepting this
code, and gcc 6 correctly rejecting it.
