https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|wrong-code |documentation
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here ( http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/struct_initialization ) I read:
...
When initializing a union, the initializer list must have only one member,
which initializes the first member of the union unless a designated initializer
is used (since C99).
...
That sound like the behaviour I'm observing. In that case, it's not wrong-code,
but the gcc documentation is misleading.
