https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com> --- I assume that there is still issue in lto part of compiler - even if we ignore "inline" attribute we (lto) must not delete such functions from binaries. So this bug must be forwarded to lto phase. 2016-08-03 19:43 GMT+03:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 > > Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution|--- |INVALID > > --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #2) >> Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000 >> with this flag? > > Yes and it should be considered a portability flag. > > Basically GNU90 and ISO C99 inline behave slightly different which is why you > are seeing this. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
