https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #34 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #33) > Created attachment 39275 [details] > Patch candidate for the fallout > > Hi Andread. *Andreas > > Can you please test me the following patch. I understand why the symbol is > undefined, but what I don't understand why is atomic update mode selected > for the test-case. Following patch should detect whether a target is capable > of atomic update operations, however libgcov.a would still contain > __atomic_fetch_add_8, which should be fine as soon as nobody is calling > functions that contain the symbol?